What is a Between Subjects Design In Behavioral Science?

What is Between Subjects Design?

Between subjects design, also known as an independent groups design, is a research method commonly used in experimental and quasi-experimental research. In this design, participants are randomly assigned to different groups, each of which is exposed to a different level or condition of the independent variable. The outcomes of the groups are then compared to assess the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. By using random assignment, researchers can minimize the influence of confounding factors and increase the likelihood that observed differences in outcomes are due to the manipulation of the independent variable, rather than other factors.

Examples of Between Subjects Design

  • Pharmaceutical Trials

    In a study evaluating the effectiveness of a new pain relief medication, one group of participants could be given the experimental drug while another group receives a placebo. The outcomes, such as reported pain levels, are then compared between the two groups to determine the drug’s effectiveness.

  • Marketing Research

    When testing the impact of different advertisements on consumer behavior, researchers could expose one group of participants to Ad A and another group to Ad B. The subsequent purchasing behavior or attitudes towards the advertised product could then be compared between the two groups to determine which advertisement was more effective.

  • Educational Interventions

    In a study evaluating the impact of a new teaching technique on student performance, one group of students could be taught using the traditional method while another group is taught using the new technique. Researchers would then compare the academic outcomes of the two groups to assess the effectiveness of the new teaching method.

Shortcomings and Criticisms of Between Subjects Design

  • Individual Differences

    Between subjects designs can be sensitive to the influence of individual differences among participants, which may introduce confounding factors or reduce the ability to detect true effects. This issue can be partially mitigated by using random assignment and larger sample sizes.

  • Resource Requirements

    Compared to within-subjects designs, between subjects designs often require more participants to achieve the same level of statistical power. This can result in increased time and resource requirements for the study.

  • Non-equivalent Groups

    Despite the use of random assignment, it is possible that the groups may not be equivalent on all important variables, leading to confounding effects. This concern can be addressed by using additional research designs, such as matched pairs or pretest-posttest designs, to control for potential confounding factors.

Related Articles

Default Nudges: Fake Behavior Change

Default Nudges: Fake Behavior Change

Read Article →
​Here's Why the Loop is Stupid

Here’s Why the Loop is Stupid

Read Article →
How behavioral science can be used to build the perfect brand

How behavioral science can be used to build the perfect brand

Read Article →
The death of behavioral economics

The Death Of Behavioral Economics

Read Article →